The experience of writing...
Helen Keller said it best:
"It seems to me that the great difficulty of writing is to make the language of the educated mind express our confused ideas, half feelings, half thoughts, when we are little more than bundles of instinctive tendencies. Trying to write is very much like trying to put a chinese puzzle together. We have a pattern in mind which we wish to work out in words; but the words will not fit the spaces, or, if they do, they will not match the design. But we keep on trying because we know that others have succeeded, and we are not willing to acknowledge defeat." (The Story of My Life, chap XIV).
My experience of writing is similar to the above summary of Keller's self-expressed feelings towards the written language. However, Keller and I were born with more than a century between us, resulting in differences of both our society and uses of the english language.
Another difference between us is that I am neither blind nor deaf, where she was both. These disabilities provide her with an extreme disadvantage, yet she writes and expresses herself in such an advanced way, one that I could only dream and aspire to. At times she must have felt isolated and inescapably alone, left to her own device with nothing but time to internalize her thoughts and feelings; but, did this in-iteslf prove to be advantageous for Keller? She had the time to thoroughly think things through before she typed them.
"A look is often the very soul of what one says."(chap VII). Therefore, I may not have the ability to express myself through words the way she did, but I also rely on sight and sound as a means for self-expression, two things Keller did not have.
In conclusion, writing this blog entry out by pen and paper first, did prove to be enjoyable. I find it thrilling to stare at a blank piece of paper, because it conjures up inspiration for the words that I hope will come. However, it also makes writing more difficult. I dislike not having the ability to back-track and edit the way I can with modern day technology. Thus so far, this blog entry is not written in as organized a manner as I usually am able to achieve by means of a word processor on my mac laptop. Whereby I can cut, copy and paste my ideas into a more organized format at my leisure, Keller must have struggled with this also. Or, maybe it is all about what one gets used too? We are, after all conditioned by our surroundings and I am surrounded by - the digital era.
Monday, 14 October 2013
Monday, 7 October 2013
The Anonymity Issues with The World-Wide-Web
My professor wants me to
write a 500-word essay on how issues of race
and gender interact with the issue of potential anonymity online. Okay, cool. This
is a broad topic for so few words, and to top it off, I’m required to have some
sort evidence to back up my logical reasoning. So where to begin?
Firstly, my
opinion is that race should not be an issue with anonymity online. If anything,
the world-wide-web makes us interconnected and increases our accessibility to
all different races. The world is no longer a large and foreign place. We are
becoming more similar, or at least increasingly understanding, to different
races each and every day. For evidence to back up my reasoning type the term
‘global village’ into Google and see for yourself the information that comes
up. (Or, go directly to: http://www.globalization101.org/the-global-village)
However, maybe
I am being a little too optimistic about race on a global scale. For instance,
if someone’s second language is English and they posted something anonymous
online, I might be able to decipher from their use of vocabulary or slang that
they are a different race, which would pose as an issue for online anonymity.
But race does not really pose as too big of an issue, especially in the
multi-cultural country I live; every day we become increasing assimilated to
the point where I could not detect someone’s race in an anonymous post. For
example, I have a friend, I knew he wasn’t originally from our country because
of his beautiful darker complexion, but I had no idea what his ethnic
background may be. Why? Because he has the exact same mannerisms as anyone else
in our age demographic and I couldn’t detect an accent other than the one I
assume everyone of this nationality has. So one day, I asked him what his
ethnicity is he told me he’s East Indian, or at least, that is where his family
is originally from. He was born here in this country and although he may be a
different ‘race,’ if he were to post anonymously online, I would not be able to
detect that he was East Indian.
Now, gender
is a different thing all together, gender can be more identifiable with a person’s
writing style, views and even adjectives used. Therefore gender is an issue
with online anonymity. For instance, I used the words, “beautiful darker
complexion” to describe my East Indian friend. From this adjective used, you as
the reader can possibly predict my gender. For one, if you view that ‘sex’ and
‘gender’ are interchangeable then you would assume that I am a heterosexual
woman, as no straight male would use the adjective ‘beautiful’ to describe a male friend. However, if
you know anything about the binary sex-gender system (for more information on
it go to: https://www.genderspectrum.org/understanding-gender)then you
could also assume that I could also be a homosexual male, or possibly
transgender. Either way, my writing style can lead a reader to conjure up ideas
as to my gender identity, posing an issue for online anonymity.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)